Top Melee Toon post patch?
Posted: Mon Sep 22, 2003 2:50 pm
Skald? Savage? Thane? Warrior? Berserker?
Oh wait I respecced...n/mPage 1 of 2
Posted: Mon Sep 22, 2003 3:00 pm
definately my cleric Oh wait I respecced...n/m
Oh wait I respecced...n/mPosted: Mon Sep 22, 2003 3:55 pm
zerker LA will make a come back.
Posted: Mon Sep 22, 2003 3:58 pm
Better yet, Shadowzerk LA 
Stabathia need some love....
Stabathia need some love....
Posted: Mon Sep 22, 2003 4:03 pm
Thanes are nice now. Skalds were always good.
Warriors are GONE.
Zerkers are decent.
SB's got better.
Warriors are GONE.
Zerkers are decent.
SB's got better.
Posted: Mon Sep 22, 2003 5:50 pm
THANES for the WIN 
Posted: Mon Sep 22, 2003 7:12 pm
Is it worth bringing back my berserker? I want to play again, but I hear they are gimp... also have the aug/mend shammy, either worth playing?
Posted: Mon Sep 22, 2003 7:28 pm
Im going to say warriors
Posted: Mon Sep 22, 2003 7:40 pm
LoL, by far a savage pwns all. There is no doubt in my mind. My sb is twinked to the max and totally gets pwned by savages. I can actually beat Low RR warriors and Zerkers as a RR7 shadowblade. But going against a RR1 savage in df armor I get pwned everytime haha
Posted: Mon Sep 22, 2003 7:41 pm
I said POST PATCH... 
Posted: Tue Sep 23, 2003 12:03 am
Guyute we need both, but you play a Zerker much better, bring him!
Posted: Tue Sep 23, 2003 6:51 am
I think 2handed savages are the meanest thing in the game, Kinda unreal to have one attack faster than I can with my minstrel, hitting 4x as hard
Posted: Tue Sep 23, 2003 8:44 am
2-hander savages are nice.. and with the new style patch, and mid gets an evade style in our lines.. the 2-hander savage is going to be making a major comback
Posted: Tue Sep 23, 2003 11:10 am
If warriors pre patch are more desired than zerkers, why are zerkers better post patch?
Posted: Tue Sep 23, 2003 12:40 pm
for a zerker does it matter if you are LA/AXE LA/SWORD LA/HAMMER
my zerk who is like a bub from 44 is LA/Hammer
my zerk who is like a bub from 44 is LA/Hammer